Now you can listen to this article on The PonkaBlog Podcast!
I’ve said several times that if someone could come up with a good enough argument for me to get vacksinated, I’d do it. Today, I’m going to let you know exactly what it would take to convince me.
It’s pretty simple really. Before I roll up my sleeve, I need to be convinced of three things: First, that the drugs are necessary. Second, that the drugs are safe. And third, that the drugs work.
To Big Pharma
You can’t announce record revenue numbers fueled by vackseen sales and expect me to believe that the information you’re providing is impartial. Pfizer recently announced that they expect global sales for their COVID-19 vackseen to top $33.5 billion in 2021. That’s just Pfizer. Can you seriously expect me to believe all those Benjamins aren’t a motive to exaggerate the effectiveness, and downplay the dangerousness, of your product?
I believe every single thing you tell me is part of a massive marketing campaign designed to sell more drugs. Furthermore, until you accept liability for any and all damages caused by your drug, I’m not going to be convinced they’re safe enough to inject. Well, not into me anyway.
You want me to be vacksinated? Convince me your vackseen is necessary by selling your product at cost. Convince me that your product is safe by accepting responsibility, in both civil and criminal courts, for the damage caused by your not-ready-for-primetime experimental drug.
To “The Experts”
You STILL count all unvacksinated people merely exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as having been infected with COVID-19. And you’re still using the misleading PCR test that even the FDA and the CDC don’t have faith in. If the PCR test isn’t good enough to use after the end of this year, it isn’t good enough to use now. It was never good enough. So, stop using it as a tool to scare everybody.
While you’re at it, you need to make unvacksinated cases jump over the same high hurdle as vacksinated cases before they’re counted. The way it works right now, I can drive into “Bob’s Discount Testing Emporium” and if my snot test is positive, I’ve got COVID. But, if someone is vacksinated, to be counted as a “breakthrough” case, they need to be sick enough to be hospitalized. Or dead.
Nobody cares if someone has COVID and displays mild or no symptoms. A “case” of COVID should be counted only if it results in hospitalization. A fatal case of COVID should be counted only if COVID is determined to be a major contributing factor in the person’s death. It should work that way for both vacksinated people and unvacksinated people. Period.
Oh yeah, before you can convince me that the “scourge” of COVID is as bad as it’s hyped up to be, you’ll need to revisit every case currently classified as a “COVID” case and apply this higher-hurdle criteria. Only then will we have numbers we can compare.
A vaccine should be considered a last resort. If there are other ways of preventing the disease (such as taking zinc and D supplements and losing weight) and other drugs that work (such as HCQ and Ivermectin) we should follow that path first. Before you come at me with a needle, prove to me that we’ve exhausted every other possible, and safer, alternative.
Now, about the safety of the drugs. You use the argument that someone merely exposed to a virus definitely died from the disease the virus may cause. Then, when someone dies shortly after being injected with the vackseen, you say that it was a coincidence, and that person was probably going to die anyway…at that very instant. Pick a logic and stay with it. I don’t even care which logic you use.
Everyone paying attention (which, I admit, may not include you) has heard reports of horrible side effects caused by the drugs. A lot of them. But nobody knows for sure the scope of the issue. I need to see a process in place that demonstrates to me that the adverse reactions are being accurately counted and seriously investigated. Right now, it appears to me that these issues are being swept under the rug.
As for the effectiveness…let’s see…you inject billions of people with a vackseen that specifically targets a small bullseye painted on certain virus. Then, when that virus mutates and the target moves, everybody pretends to be surprised that your shot no longer hits it. So, you create a “booster shot” designed to hit another very specific target. And the virus mutates some more. Requiring yet another booster shot. Which generates even more revenue for Big Pharma. It sounds like a textbook example of planned obsolescence to me.
To Joe Biden
Stop talking. No, I’m serious. For the love of God please stop talking. You’re not making any sense at all.
The Real Challenge
I’m probably never going to believe Big Pharma. Because the countless billions of dollars being generated every year by the vackseens practically guarantees that they’re lying. At least a little bit. I just don’t know about what.
As for “the experts”, because the biggest OMG-the-virus-is-super-scary expert of them all has admitted to manipulating us, I assume everything every pro-vackseen expert says has a spin on it. I realize that this “guilt-by-association” stance probably isn’t fair, but I’d rather be overly cautious than maimed or dead.
So, you want me to be vacksinated? Whether you’re Big Pharma or one of “the Experts”, your real challenge is that, before you can convince me of anything, you need to first rebuild your credibility. You need to prove to me that your motives aren’t driven by greed, stupidity, or the desire for political gain.
Yeah. Good luck with that.
Related Articles:
